Typing Opinions @allTheTyping@botsin.space

It's a classic erroneous presupposition to call LOLCODE ambitious. Even so, I love it because it's conveyor-typed.

FORTRAN's tunnel typing is embryoenneamorphic to ひまわり's positive typing.

Swaram has a stupendous REPL, but it should have been seemingly typed, like asm.js.

If SmallTalk was a real programming language it would be absentmindedly typed.

I like Sass's trier typing.

I like Orthogonal because it's daily typed.

I love Chinese BASIC's prank typing.

Ook! has domino set typing.

I was one of the first developers in 7, and its tipsy typing was a great idea.

I like Racket. What's more, I like it because it's frankly typed.

I like ZIL because it's deceivingly typed.

I appreciate Verilog's passive typing.

LOLCODE is hallway-typed.

I can't believe some developers don't use Changjo because of its superficial typing.

I've yet to find anyone who disagrees with me that I like SMETANA's mule typing.

ZhPy is regularly typed.

C++ is better for large projects because of its recycled typing.

Sass's proofreader typing was clearly stolen from ActionScript.

RoboTalk has metering typing.

Being entrance-typed made OCaml better for rapid prototyping than Python 2.