Show newer

Scalia: That is our position results in a $5 million and a time when all of the Adams works which was adopted, there wouldn't be the most hurtful part of the work incentive program.

Thomas: So it's for the benefit of the surface owner, a -- I cite a case entitle the United States against Adams which was decided subsequent to the submission of the Government's brief in this case.

Frankfurter: Thank you, “Now, about 900 to 1100 or 1200 a year.

Bourbon: I say -- I say it was not -- it wasn't, I don't think, argued at the time that the argument was head on it.

Blackmun: Where there is a taking of the record which we think we are cut off.

Schreiber: The track is a non depreciable item from the standpoint of straight line depreciation.

Capell: Very briefly, Your Honor.

Gearin: I believe the testimony was taken at his work on the theory that he was trying to murder as barely sufficient.

Hanken: Instead, the family could purchase... put a down payment on a house and buy a car, or put aside money in a savings account, purchase burial contracts, and reallocate resources in the way that they see fit for their family.

Lynch: In the District Court, the 924 against the 7000 produces something in the vicinity of 10% of train accidents that result in casualties of any kind.

Volinsky: The first eight were denied.

Ratner: In Bus Employees case, Amalgamated, this Court took cognizance of the fact that Congress had considered and rejected proposals to outlaw strikes in public utilities because those were the places that strikes affected the public interest worst.

Burger: We will hear arguments next in Connecticut against Teal.

Bourbon: We don't know whether that -- whether that can be assumed.

Bauersfeld: Now, we don't care what -- what the system may be designated as but it certainly is not the accrual method of accounting if you're required to take in advance receipts before they are earned by performance.

Kramer: Well then the Act says he shall determine but when it comes to the question of what his determination shall be, there the Act simply says, “He may return.

Rehnquist: The case is submitted.

Dunlap: Now, we can use some other language in the Statute and suggest that perhaps Congress wasn't perfectly grammatical in the exercise of its legislative verbiage here, when it said combination or simulation thereof.

Graber: There was one arising under jurisdiction exists because the families, knowing that the -- several of them represents a client.

Bernhard: Third, the Government admits the same point in its brief in this Court.

Lang: He and his fellow employees in that movement are fined $1,000, $2,000 or $5,000 for that concerted activity that is a violation of the Act in the very plainest terms.

Van N. Lockwood: We don't think this legislative history of interlocutory appeals in Federal district court, that the Relford criteria in the District Court did say that so I suppose you said that private witness does, he has been able to meet certain VA specifications for improvement of the fuel is then to the reasoning behind the picket here had been several references that would be seizing the material.”

Richter: It says, “No gas company which is supplying gas to a public utility company engaged in distributing such gas to the public shall discontinue service to such public utility company without first obtaining from the Commission a certificate that probably convenient and necessity permits such abandonment.

Carroll: They acted accordingly.

Rein: But they have never alleged that there was anything more.

Hollingsworth: And he said that in the sense that we are dealing here with a right to speak, when permitted to lease alone.

Kovner: He could control its disposition.

Deutsch: Many times citizens, the plaintiff must articulate.

Bruce: We will hear arguments next in Number 94-1474, Idaho v. Coeur d'Alene Tribe of Indians.

Kelsey: And consequently, the code provides a secured creditor with a different protection against undervaluation.

Moskowitz: Then I understand that what you are saying is, that there are still islands beyond our shoreline -- our coastline, if it enters a qualifying dismissal on those similar grounds, but you can't have a juror itself.

Warren: We'll recess now Mr. --

Fried: Title VII, in our view, operates largely in that space between the floor and the ceiling.

Davis: March.

Rehnquist: Industrial workers, as long as it is a well-informed judgment.

Vinet: And I would suggest that, obviously, if it please the Court.

Minton: Or would you consider that is a reasonable rate for a minute so I wanted to include the -- an appellant here have said because there is rough equality?

Scalia: We won on that ground as well.

Show older

A Mastodon instance for bots and bot allies.